24The fundamental openness that presupposes an initial immersion in the world, certain limits of self-understanding and self-expression, honesty and therefore vulnerability to the other, which allow a meaningful dialogue, is replaced by an apparently sure and therefore attractive apparent openness of the digital human being, capable of infinite variability, but incapable of a real dialogue and therefore also of thinking and acting. Finally, we urgently need to address our digital privacy rights. Decisive action by states and corporations enables surveillance that fuels analysis, prediction and even manipulation of our behaviors, sometimes to the detriment of free and fair elections and democratic processes. There is no doubt that digital technologies have led our world to unprecedented human progress. La Chapelle, B. and Fehlinger, P. (2016). Case law on the Internet: how to overcome the legal arms race. Observer Research Foundation Series and Global Policy Journal. Digital debates.
CyFy Journal, 3, 8-14; Press conference on privacy rights in the digital age September 15, 2021 Often cited as the pioneer of file-sharing websites for illegal music downloads and cybertheft, Napster has left a legacy in cyberspace copyright that won`t be forgotten anytime soon. The website does not send copyrighted files to other users, but rather combines the files of all users who are logged into the website at the same time and allows users to download them.30 This innocuous scenario usually results in users sharing copyrighted material such as music. software and movies. Through its activities, the Institute strives to provide lawyers, judges, legal educators and the public with a balanced picture of issues affecting the United States. Civil justice. “People are waking up to us that this digital age is not neutral…, it is mainly presented to us by big companies that want to make a profit,” he said. Hannah Arendt explores the history of our experience, revealing not only a radical transformation of its structure, but also the loss of experience as such and its replacement by technology. In order to identify the place of law in this process, we try to hermeneutically clarify the legal aspect of experience phenomenologically and understand its transformation in the digital age. The experience of law is thought of as one of the aspects of our way of being in the world, which is based on cosmopolitanism and consists in the mutual recognition of the human person in his dignity. Digital technologies, on the other hand, are helping to replace fundamental openness with illusory freedom in cyberspace. The latter, unlike the public space as a sphere of action of many and, in this sense, legal fields, is mainly based on the productive activities of an individual and no longer requires a law. This conference examines the promises and challenges we face in the new digital age and explores how the U.S.
justice system can continue to provide the business and consumer sectors with the tailored protection we`re accustomed to, and helps define the responsibilities of each sector. 38Digital technologies take this process to a new level and help replace action with simple operation and fundamental openness with illusory freedom in cyberspace. The latter, unlike the public sphere as a sphere of action and responsibility of many, and in this sense the legal sphere, is increasingly a field of productive activity of an individual and no longer needs the law. 20Is it not the disappearance of public space that we observe in today`s digital world, where we are “all trapped in the subjectivity of our own unique experience, which continues to be singular when the same experience is multiplied countless times” (Arendt, 1998, p. 58)? As a result, the judgment fell under a hail of blows. It is a constant exhausting presence in the overwhelming flow of information, where we are also manipulated using the digital tools to which we are exposed. It is a general simplification of complex topics, wrapped in an attractive and shiny shell that makes us take someone`s position – because we are willing to rely on someone`s experience (perhaps it seems too complicated to study the subject ourselves, or we are under pressure from society, or we are in the bubble of opinions). In March, the EGE issued a statement on artificial intelligence (AI), robotics and autonomous systems, criticising the “current patchwork of different initiatives” in Europe that seek to address the social, legal and ethical issues raised by AI.
In the statement, the EGE called for the creation of a structured framework. In Canada, the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada sued the Canadian Association of Internet Providers in a similar situation in 2004. However, unlike the Napster case, the plaintiff did not file a lawsuit for connecting users who make illegal downloads to a particular website, but for providing the Internet service used by the authors. This case, known as SOCAN, involved the location of Internet service providers – known as ISPs – in another attempt to find a party responsible for copyright infringement on the Internet. 22The digital world and the dynamics of its growth affect each individual, although the degree of its influence varies. It goes without saying that the world is extremely heterogeneous, but at the end of the day, progressive and massive digitalization also reaches people with radically different cultural, economic and social experiences. The legal implications of digital technologies are linked to fundamental elements such as autonomy, human rights, the rule of law, justice and democracy. Even the least obvious manifestations of the digital world still have a subtle impact on everyone, even changing the experience of many. Digital identity, in particular, has an unduly strong impact on human identity as such. Online activities and social media are gradually and imperceptibly changing our idea of ourselves. The images you share in cyberspace are cemented by an incredibly long digital footprint. The images that others share may be far from the truth or deliberately fragmented.
3In this article, we attempt to clarify the legal aspect of experience in terms of phenomenological hermeneutics and trace its transformation in the digital age. When we think of law in terms of human experience, we move from eidetics (identifying the essential contours of the idea of law, extracted from its actual instantiations) to constitutional analysis (describing how law is inscribed in human experience). Campbell, D. (2001). Can the digital divide be bridged? International Labour Review, 140(2), 119-141; In the information age, a reasonable question is whether Internet censorship and individual liberty can coexist under international law. Unlike other countries — even those that share a similar Western philosophy — the United States tends to support free speech and freedom of the press, even when it could pose a threat to national security. Today, this ideal has reached a peak of conflict in the new era of technology. State censorship, copyright infringements and the misappropriation of secret documents are now major points of contention on international approaches to cyberspace policy. This article will address a number of issues related to cyberspace and the regulation of this relatively unexplored new area of law, while proposing and analyzing solutions to these problems. In the modern age of cyberspace and technology, advances pose new threats to the legal order. A 2010 census found that 2 billion people – more than a quarter of the world`s population – use, communicate and share information around the world.1 This virtual reality is developing at an incredible rate, but the laws that govern it are relatively immature and difficult to follow.
First, protecting our right to participate is essential to protecting democracy. Civil society has a key role to play in this regard – it must be meaningfully involved in the development of policies, regulations and other measures related to digital technologies and the online space. Journalists and civil society actors must have open and secure access to online spaces, free from surveillance and censorship. States and online companies have a responsibility to ensure this and to ensure that we use threats. OHCHR has organized expert consultations and issued reports to examine the challenges facing the right to privacy and other human rights in the digital age, as called for in relevant General Assembly and Human Rights Council resolutions.