The popularity of “food sovereignty” to cover a range of positions, interventions and struggles within the food system is a testament to the adaptability of the term. Food sovereignty is primarily, but not exclusively, about groups of people making their own decisions about the food system – it`s a way of talking about a theoretically informed practice of the food system. Given that people are different, we should expect decisions on food sovereignty to be different in different contexts, albeit in accordance with a set of core principles (including women`s rights, a common rejection of GM crops, and calls to remove agriculture from existing international trade agreements). In this article, we examine the analytical sticking points in the application of food sovereignty ideas in the context of Indigenous struggles in North America. This, in our view, helps clarify one of the central issues of food sovereignty: that it is a continuation of anti-colonial struggles, even in postcolonial contexts. Such a study has benefits for both food sovereignty scholars and Indigenous politics: by helping to problematize notions of food sovereignty and post-coloniality, but also by asking gender-specific questions for Indigenous struggles. Prof. To` Puan Dr. Nor Asiah Mohamad holds a PhD in Land Law and Equity (IIUM). She holds an LLB Hons (IIUM) and an LLB in Sharia (IIUM) as well as a Master`s degree in Comparative Law (IIUM).
His areas of expertise are land law, condominium law, Islamic endowment (Waqf), Islamic property law and housing law. It has a great interest in the harmonisation of legislation. She also teaches courses on sustainability and parenting and family management at the undergraduate level. She has published articles, written chapters in books on commercial law, land law, waqf, Islamic finance and harmonization law, and has published books on waqf, land, equity and equitable remedies. She has also led various research and advisory work related to water, land, strata, waqf, residential rentals, short-term rentals and housing. She holds various administrative positions as Director, Director of Student Development, Head of the Civil Law Department, Vice-Dean of Postgraduate Studies and member of the Department of Land Property and Environment and the Department of Property Law, and is a member of the Main Committee of the Waqf International Action (i-Waqf). Prof. Dr.
Ainul Jaria Maidin holds a PhD in Environmental and Spatial Planning Law (University of Wales) and an LLM and LLB from IIUM. Prior to joining IIUM as a lecturer, she gained valuable experience in civil litigation, Syari`ah, business transfer and Islamic bank credit documentation. She has also contributed to professional bodies such as the National Landscape Institute (ILAM), the Association of Urban Planners and as an advisory board member of the Institute for Land and Survey (INSTUN) and the Kuala Lumpur Redevelopment Policy Drafting Committee, 2011. She regularly lectures and lectures in the areas of land law, environmental law, property law and other similar topics. She has published three books and more than 50 articles on land ownership, land use planning, sustainable development, urban planning and land use law. The Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d`éducation artistique Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy If you buy books through these links, the Internet Archive may earn a small commission. Dr. Fauziah Mohd Noor holds an LLB (Hons) (UM), LLM (SOAS) and PhD (Birmingham). She is currently a Senior Lecturer at the Islamic Business School, College of Business at Utara University in Malaysia. From 1993 to 2013, she was Assistant Professor at Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia. His areas of interest are Islamic jurisprudence (Usul al-Fiqh), Islamic banking, Islamic family law and Islamic land law. Previously, she was a member of the Sharia Committee of Bank Simpanan Nasional Malaysia for 10 years (2008-2018).
Dr. Fauziah has also participated in numerous trainings organized by the United Nations and UN Women in Malaysia. For some, the problem with the dominance of instrumental rationality is the tendency towards anomie. However, this ignores the instrumental use of norms by elite groups to manipulate public opinion. Such manipulation can then allow elite groups to treat citizens as a means to pursue their own interests. Horkheimer was one of the first to recognize the problem in this form, but could not offer a solution because he understood citizens as passive. In contrast, Dewey argued that active citizenship values participation in public life as inherently good. This has to do with his conception of democracy as an ethical way of life, which offers the possibility of overcoming the domination of instrumental rationality. This article discusses Dewey`s solution to the problem in light of the weaknesses attributed here to Horkheimer and the subsequent developments of Bellah, Bernstein, Gellner, Habermas, and Honneth.
www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/1/19 If subscribers cancel within 30 days of ordering or receiving the product and return the product at their own expense, they will receive a full credit of the annual subscription price.